Today and yesterday in New Hampshire have been gorgeous for The Campaign To Change America.
I was contacted early in the week to be involved in a conference call ahead of Wednesday's debate with John Edward's campaign strategists. It wasn't just them and me to be sure - but I gather there were less than 200 of us across the country on this call. How did I rate this special treatment? Not for much, I would say. I am a captain in our local One Corps chapter - along with Dustin Blythe. He and I have certainly put effort into the campaign. But I think we were invited because we identified ourselves as wanting to make a difference. That really seems to be enough.
In the interest of full disclosure: I am a political junkie, and this is the first campaign I have been absolutely fired up about. I now understand evangelism. So...
The call was so cool. We didn't hear from unknown operatives. Instead, the first speaker was none other than David Bonior, the National Campaign Manager. I'm sure most of you know the Hon. David Bonior, former House Majority Whip from Michigan as a tireless supporter of progressive causes for decades. What you may not know is that he holds his position with the Edwards campaign (unpaid), despite his determination to retire from politics. The mood that surrounds this campaign is that it's finally time to do something!
We got a real clear idea of the strategy and our assets in the first four states. A couple things that stood out was that although Senators Clinton and Obama have spent over 4 million dollars on television ads in Iowa recently, our lead in the polls had not diminished. The second thing that caught my attention was that Senator Edwards had quietly accumulated more African American elected official endorsements in South Carolina than Clinton and Obama combined.
So, John Edwards has real strength in three of the four early states - strong union support in Nevada - but New Hampshire seems challenging. Enter two gorgeous days.
In the debate at Dartmouth, he looked like The President. He was calm, clear and unflappable. No analyst I heard claimed anything less than a fantastic outing for him. None.
So, how do you follow that? Today, he was at the University of New Hampshire for a MySpace/MTV dialogue. There was a large audience on site, but many people - including me - watched online. The online viewers were offered the opportunity to rate his responses to individual questions and eventually his overall responses.
He did pretty well. In the end, the overall favorable vote was roughly 93%.
I love the smell of democracy - it smells like victory.
Don Wheeler
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"We got a real clear idea of the strategy and our assets in the first four states."
the msm buzz is that edwards accepting federal campaign money means he's no longer raising cash at the levels he was in the first quarter.
he would be limited to $50 million fundraising for the primary cycle by law, suggesting his first quarter fundraising might have been his best.
comments?
It's an intriguing development, and I'm sure I'm not the only supporter nervous about it.
The conference call I referred to offered no information about this decision - that decision was announced the next day. I do have my own thoughts about it.
First, there was and is no prospect of duplicating the first quarter fundraising figure. That kind of money won't be back until Edwards wins Iowa.
So it makes this choice interesting. He's likely to be able to raise more on his own, yet this choice means he can probably rely on the online fund raising apparatus and use his own time for straight campaigning. That means skipping events like we had just down the road from me earlier this week, where the minimum cover charge was $500 a head.
It's another bold, unconventional choice and probably not what they'd have picked under ideal conditions. But these folks have always struck me as quick on their feet and I'm guessing they've assessed the options carefully. It does have the beauty of laying down a serious marker for public financing and it's a nice finesse -Obama and Clinton can't do this even if they wanted to without returning some of their contributions, I suspect.
Post a Comment